Inference and logical conclusion (1): must, can't



We use must to assert what we infer or conclude to be the most likely
interpretation of a situation or events:

    He must be at least sixty.

We don't know for a fact that this is true, but taking everything into account,
we think that it is almost certainly so. The opposite of must in this
sense is can't:

    John: He must be at least sixty.
    Peter: Oh no! He can't be anything like as old as that.

John is almost certain that 'He' is sixty, and Peter is equally certain that
He' is not. In reported speech, this dialogue becomes:

    John said he must be at least sixty, but Peter thought he could n't be
    anything like as old as that.

To refer to past time, we use must and can't (or couldn't) with the perfect
infinitive:

    It must have been a great shock to him. ( It was a great shock, I feel sure.)
    You can't ( or couldn't) have understood what he said. (It seems clear
    that you didn't understand.)


Back to Top